Digital Artist · L0001 · 2026-07-16
Quest-perfection walkthrough of the Web Fundamentals slice digital-artist/0001 on 2026-07-16, engine verdict warn. An evidence-based, learner's-eye…
Table of Contents
- 🎯 Session Summary
- 🗺️ The Journey
- 🔬 Evidence
- 1. GitHub Pages Basics — 82 / pass · ran 9/7 runnable snippets (9 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped, 3 reasoned)
- 2. Jekyll Fundamentals — 88 / pass · ran 11/10 runnable snippets (10 passed, 1 failed, 4 skipped, 3 reasoned)
- 3. YAML Configuration — NO EVIDENCE (engine max_turns, 40)
- 4. Git Workflow Mastery — 80 / pass · ran 7/10 runnable snippets (7 passed, 0 failed, 3 skipped, 2 reasoned)
- 5. Liquid Templating — NO EVIDENCE (engine max_turns, 40)
- 🐞 Issues Found
- 🔗 Chain Continuity
- 🧠 Reasoning & Method
Slice
digital-artist/0001· Level 0001 (Web Fundamentals) · Apprentice tier · Engine verdict ⚠️ warn · Walked 2026-07-16🔗 Perfection run · 🏠 Perfection dashboard · 📄 Raw report · 🕘 Change history
🎯 Session Summary
Walked a 5-quest window (window 1 of 6; the full Level 0001 slice is 26 quests) of the Digital Artist (UI/UX) path at level 0001 — Web Fundamentals as a learner, using the sealed execute-mode evidence the workflow pre-computed. The three quests the engine scored are technically solid: every locally-runnable command in GitHub Pages Basics (82), Jekyll Fundamentals (88), and Git Workflow Mastery (80) was actually executed in a disposable Jekyll sandbox and behaved as documented — no broken commands, no unsafe steps. Average score across the scored quests is 83.3%.
The headline verdict is WARN, not PASS, for one honest reason: 2 of the 5
planned quests have no execute evidence at all — yaml-configuration and
liquid-templating both hit the engine’s max_turns limit (40) and returned no
verdict (overall: 0.0, verdict: "fail"). That is a harness/engine exhaustion,
not an observed content defect — I did not witness those quests fail, so I refuse
to report them as passing or as genuinely failing. They are reasoned about
statically below and flagged as uncovered. A maintainer should treat this slice as
60% machine-verified.
🗺️ The Journey
Plan order (as walk-plan.json selected — note this window is not dependency-sorted;
see Chain Continuity):
- ✅ GitHub Pages Basics: Host Your Jekyll Site for Free — 82 · every baseurl /
relative_url/JEKYLL_ENV=production/gh api :ownerpath ran clean; docked for a stated-but-undelivered “GitHub Actions Build” objective and no plugin-safelist warning. - ✅ Jekyll Fundamentals: Build Static Sites with Ruby — 88 · strongest quest;
install →
jekyll new→ serve → collections → build all verified live; the one real failure isremote_themesilently no-op’ing without the unmentionedjekyll-remote-themeplugin. - ❌ YAML Configuration: Site Settings Mastery — no verdict · engine hit
max_turns(40); no commands recorded. Reasoned-only below — treat as uncovered. - ✅ Git Workflow Mastery: Branches, Merging & Team Collaboration — 80 · branch/commit/push,
true merge-commit vs rebase, and a hand-built conflict all reproduced exactly; docked for
no
gh auth loginstep andgit revertnamed-but-never-shown. - ❌ Liquid Templating: Dynamic Content for Jekyll Sites — no verdict · engine hit
max_turns(40) after a sandbox permission denial on a backgroundjekyll serve --livereload; no commands recorded. Reasoned-only below — treat as uncovered.
🔬 Evidence
All command outcomes below come verbatim from the sealed walk-evidence.json
(execute mode, real sandbox). I ran no engine myself; I read the quest sources and the
sealed evidence.
1. GitHub Pages Basics — 82 / pass · ran 9/7 runnable snippets (9 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped, 3 reasoned)
git init && git add . && git commit -m "Initial site"on a realjekyll newscaffold → passed (7 files committed, exit 0)._config.ymlurl/baseurl+bundle exec jekyll build --baseurl "/my-castle"→ passed: every href in_site/index.htmlcorrectly prefixed/my-castle/…, confirmingrelative_url/baseurl mechanics.JEKYLL_ENV=production bundle exec jekyll buildwith{% if jekyll.environment == "production" %}{% include analytics.html %}{% endif %}→ passed: include absent from dev build, present in production build (verified end-to-end with a real_includes/analytics.html).gh api -X POST repos/:owner/my-castle/pages …→ passed::ownerplaceholder verified to resolve to the repo owner (401 on fake token, i.e. syntactically/semantically correct).gh repo create --public --source=. --pushflags all validated against--help.- skipped: Windows PowerShell block (no PowerShell on Linux sandbox). reasoned: macOS
brew install gh, the DNS A/CNAME tables.gh auth login/ actual publish → untested (needs real GitHub credentials — inherent, not a defect).
2. Jekyll Fundamentals — 88 / pass · ran 11/10 runnable snippets (10 passed, 1 failed, 4 skipped, 3 reasoned)
- Linux
gem install jekyll bundler(GEM_HOME, no sudo) → passed (“Successfully installed jekyll-4.4.1”, “bundler-4.0.16”). jekyll new my-castle+bundle exec jekyll serve→ passed: HTTP 200 via Ruby Net::HTTP with the expected Jekyll SEO title tag.collections: recipes:+mkdir _recipes+_recipes/bread.md+bundle exec jekyll build --verbose→ passed: wrote_site/recipes/bread/index.html.bundle exec jekyll serve --livereload --drafts→ passed: GET/recipes/bread/→ 200,<title>Hearth Bread | …</title>.bundle exec jekyll serve --config _config.yml,_config_dev.yml→ passed: dev override title won, confirming merge order.remote_theme: "bamr87/zer0-mistakes"→ FAILED: built without error but silently ignored the theme — vanillajekyllgem lacksjekyll-remote-theme; no warning, a silent no-op the quest never caveats.- skipped: macOS/Windows install paths,
docker run … jekyll/jekyll:4, anddocker-compose up -d(the latter references a compose file never defined anywhere in the quest).
3. YAML Configuration — NO EVIDENCE (engine max_turns, 40)
verdict_obj: null,overall: 0.0, zero commands recorded. The engine child process reached its turn limit before emitting a verdict. Nothing was witnessed — no pass, no fail. See Issues for the reasoned-only static read.
4. Git Workflow Mastery — 80 / pass · ran 7/10 runnable snippets (7 passed, 0 failed, 3 skipped, 2 reasoned)
git switch -c feature/… / git add / git commit / git push -u origin …against a local origin → passed (tracking set up as documented).git status/git log --oneline --graph --all/git diff→ passed (output matched the quest’s descriptions).- Merge vs rebase demo → passed: on a genuinely diverged history,
git mergemade a true merge commit andgit rebase mainreplayed the commit with a new hash — reproduced the quest’s ASCII diagrams exactly. (Engine notes a non-diverged history fast-forwards silently, which the diagram doesn’t caveat.) - Hand-built conflict → passed: markers matched the quest’s
<<<<<<< / ======= / >>>>>>>format exactly;git merge --abort/git rebase --continue/--abortall restored state cleanly. - skipped:
gh pr create/gh pr merge --squash --delete-branch—gh auth statusshowed “not logged into any GitHub hosts”; flags are valid, behavior judged by docs, not executed. macOS/Windows installs skipped (wrong OS); Linuxapt install ghreasoned (confirmed available viaapt-cache policy gh).
5. Liquid Templating — NO EVIDENCE (engine max_turns, 40)
verdict_obj: null,overall: 0.0, zero commands recorded. Recordedpermission_denials: a backgroundedbundle exec jekyll serve --livereload … && curl …was denied by the sandbox before the run exhausted its turns. Nothing was witnessed. Reasoned-only static read is in Issues.
🐞 Issues Found
Every item below is either engine-observed (cites a recorded command result) or, where marked reasoned, a static read of the quest source with the quoted line — never invented.
High
- [GitHub Pages Basics] · Chapter 1 / secondary objective — observed (content_accuracy/completeness): the objective “GitHub Actions Build — Understand how Pages can build Jekyll automatically” (line 114) is listed but no chapter ever explains the Settings → Pages → Source: GitHub Actions path; only “Deploy from a branch” is covered. Fix: add a short GitHub Actions section or drop the objective/mastery indicator.
- [Git Workflow Mastery] · Chapter 2 / System Requirements — observed:
gh auth statusreturned “not logged into any GitHub hosts”, sogh pr create/gh pr mergecannot run as written; the quest never instructsgh auth login. Fix: add an explicitgh auth loginstep before the PR snippet. - [Jekyll Fundamentals] · Chapter 4 —
docker-compose up -d— observed (skipped as unrunnable): line ~452docker-compose up -d/ port 4002 references adocker-compose.ymlthat is never defined anywhere in the quest. Fix: provide the compose file or replace with the already-showndocker run … jekyll/jekyll:4pattern.
Medium
- [Jekyll Fundamentals] · Chapter 4 —
remote_theme— observed (the one FAILED command):remote_theme: "bamr87/zer0-mistakes"builds but silently applies nothing without thejekyll-remote-themeplugin (absent from the vanillajekyllgem used all quest). Fix: note the plugin dependency, or the learner sees a no-op with no error. - [GitHub Pages Basics] · Content accuracy — observed: no mention of the
github-pagesgem pin / plugin safelist for the “Deploy from a branch” build — the single most common “builds locally, breaks on Pages” cause. Fix: add a short note. - [GitHub Pages Basics] · Linux path —
sudo apt install -y gh— reasoned (line 188): on many stock Debian/Ubuntu imagesghisn’t in default apt repos without first adding GitHub CLI’s apt repository; verbatim followers may hit “package not found”. Fix: add the repo-add caveat. - [Git Workflow Mastery] · Chapter 1 setup — observed: no step wires a real GitHub remote (
git remote add origin …/gh repo create) beforegit push -u origin feature/…; Chapter 1 assumesorigin+ tracking already exist. Plausibly deferred to the/quests/0000/git-basics/prerequisite, but not called out. - [Git Workflow Mastery] · Secondary objective “Undo Safely” — observed:
git revertis named in the objectives but no snippet ever demonstrates it (onlygit restore/git reflogget a one-line mention). Fix: add a runnablegit revert <commit>example.
Low
- [GitHub Pages Basics] · Windows path — reasoned (lines 174-176): PowerShell
;does not short-circuit on failure like bash&&, so a failedgit initwon’t stop the chain. Minor note worth adding. - [Jekyll Fundamentals] · Chapter 2 diagram — observed (reasoned in engine): the tree shows
index.md(line 307) butjekyll newscaffoldsindex.markdown/about.markdown. Cosmetic; note both extensions. - [Jekyll Fundamentals] · Chapter 4 webrick entry — reasoned: Jekyll 4.4+ already declares
webrickas a runtime dep, so the LoadError is now rare on a freshjekyll new; keep the fix for older setups but note this. - [Git Workflow Mastery] · Chapter 2 merge diagram — observed: caveat that
git mergeonly produces the “M” commit on a diverged history; a fast-forward-able branch merges with no merge commit, diverging from the diagram.
Reasoned-only (no execute evidence — quests the engine could not score)
- [YAML Configuration] · uncovered — no engine evidence (max_turns). Static read: the quest is well-structured (syntax → front matter/
_config.yml→ data files/pitfalls → production config) and its Chapter 4 plugin list does includejekyll-remote-theme(line 415) — which is exactly the plugin whose absence made Jekyll Fundamentals’remote_themeno-op. Its commands (yamllint,--configlayering,strict_front_matter: true) look runnable but were not verified this session. Needs a re-run with a higher turn budget. - [Liquid Templating] · uncovered — no engine evidence (max_turns + a serve-binding permission denial). Static read: Chapter 2’s “New” badge snippet uses
{% elsif post.date > site.time | date: "%s" | minus: 604800 %}— a date-vs-string comparison whose correctness I could not verify without running it; a real learner could plausibly hit a type mismatch here. Flag for a targeted re-run.
🔗 Chain Continuity
Reasoning about the window as one journey a Digital-Artist learner would actually take:
- Window order ≠ learning order. The plan walks GitHub Pages Basics first, but
its own frontmatter lists
required_quests: /quests/0001/jekyll-fundamentals/and its prose opens “You forged a Jekyll site in the workshop…” — you cannot host a site you haven’t built. The dependency spine is jekyll-fundamentals → {yaml-configuration, liquid-templating, github-pages-basics} → git-workflow-mastery. This is expected for a date-rotated window (offset 5 of a 26-quest level, not a topological cut), but a learner following this window’s listed order verbatim would start in the wrong place. Not a content bug — an ordering caveat for anyone reading the window as a syllabus. - Shared “my-castle” scaffold holds the chain together. Every quest assumes the same
my-castleJekyll site from Jekyll Fundamentals (verified: the engine reused one scaffold across quests). Naming and setup are consistent — good continuity once the learner has done Jekyll Fundamentals first. - Cross-quest
remote_themeinconsistency. Jekyll Fundamentals Ch4 introducesremote_theme: "bamr87/zer0-mistakes"without mentioning thejekyll-remote-themeplugin (verified: silent no-op). The very plugin that fixes it only appears later, in YAML Configuration Ch4’s plugin list. A learner hitting the silent failure in quest 2 gets no pointer forward; the two quests should cross-reference. Evidence: the one FAILED command in the whole session. - Unstated GitHub-account/auth prerequisite spans two quests. Both GitHub Pages Basics
and Git Workflow Mastery assume an authenticated GitHub session and an existing
originremote, yet neither walksgh auth loginor remote creation (both defer implicitly to/quests/0000/git-basics/, which is recommended but outside this window). Evidence:gh auth status→ “not logged in”;gh prand publish steps were the exact commands the engine could not complete. A learner who jumped straight into level 0001 gets stuck at the “last mile” of both quests. - Concepts reinforce well where they overlap.
baseurl/relative_url,JEKYLL_ENV=production, and_config.yml,_config_dev.ymllayering recur across Jekyll Fundamentals, YAML Configuration, and GitHub Pages Basics with consistent syntax — good spaced repetition for the tier. - Chain coverage is only 60% machine-verified. Two of the five links (YAML, Liquid) have no execute evidence, so I cannot certify that quest 2→3 or 4→5 hand-offs actually work end to end this session. The dependency declarations are coherent; the executed proof is partial.
🧠 Reasoning & Method
- What I ran vs. reasoned: I ran no engine myself. The evidence is the sealed
walk-evidence.json/walk-evidence.mdthe workflow pre-computed in a deterministic execute-mode step (the engine’s childclaudeprocesses can’t authenticate from an agent’s Bash tool). I consumed those files as-is, then read all five quest sources in plan order and reasoned about the linked journey. Every “passed”/”failed” above is quoted from the sealed evidence; everything I judged from source alone is marked reasoned. - Mode:
execute(disposable sandbox), as recorded in the evidence. Not review-only, not--mock. - Coverage limits (stated plainly):
- 2 of 5 quests have no evidence —
yaml-configurationandliquid-templatingboth exhausted the engine’smax_turns(40) and returnedverdict_obj: null/overall: 0.0. Theirverdict: "fail"is an engine-exhaustion artifact, not a witnessed content failure. I did not fabricate scores for them; they are reasoned-only and flagged uncovered. They should be re-run with a higher turn budget (or fewer snippets per turn) before this slice is called complete. - The
average(83.3) andpass 3 / fail 2counts in the evidence are computed only over the scored quests; do not read the “2 fail” as two bad quests. - Publish/auth “last-mile” steps (
gh auth login,gh repo create --push, live Pages publish, custom-domain DNS) are inherently unrunnable in a credential-less sandbox and were correctly skipped — not counted against the quests. - Windows/macOS platform blocks were skipped on the Linux sandbox (reasoned, not tested).
- 2 of 5 quests have no evidence —
- Confidence: High for the three scored quests — their commands were genuinely executed and the recommendations align with the quest rubric’s dimensions. Low for YAML Configuration and Liquid Templating — no evidence gathered; treat my notes there as hypotheses to verify, not findings.
- Scope discipline: one slice, one report. No quest content was edited; no other character/level was touched. The caller handles git.